![]() ![]() You’ll need to upgrade to the Phantom 4 Pro for that.īelow is an example image from the Evo – you can check out the full dataset and orthomosaic here. ![]() ![]() Note that neither of these cameras have a mechanical shutter which is preferable for mapping. Whether or not this is a deal breaker for your application, that will depend on if you are more interested in spatial detail, or spatial coverage. Given that the array of each sensor is the same (5472 x 3648 pixels), the difference in ground resolution element for each system is therefore just 0.3 cm per pixel (3.2 cm per pixel for the Evo vs. ![]() In effect this means that mapping data will cover a slightly larger area with the Evo, but with slightly lower ground resolution.įor example, at a flying altitude of 100m (over flat terrain), the width of an Evo image will represent 174m, while a Mavic image would cover 160m. The Evo has a wider field of view at 82 degrees compared to 77 degrees on the Mavic. There’s not a great deal to split between the two cameras. I was too scared to try though □ The Camera However, there is an option to change the ‘standard’ speed setting to ‘ludicrous’ and that might resolve this issue. Perhaps the Mavic is a little quieter in flight? I also found the Evo a bit slow taking off, which would be a concern for me in some environments when it’s better to get up and away (e.g. I’ve not tested these capabilities, and certainly if it’s a Force 8 wind in the marine environment there will be so much chop on the water’s surface that there’s no point in mapping anyway!Īside from these specifications (and various others that really don’t weigh in to my decisions) that you can get directly from the website of the respective drone companies, operationally these drones are very similar. Wind resistance – Incredibly the Evo claims that it can withstand up to Force 8 winds (62-74 km/h), while the Mavic only claims Force 5 (29-38 km/h).That would also mean carrying fewer batteries, so the complete package may actually end up lighter than the Mavic… Mavic’s 31 mins is a substantial difference and would result in several more hectares mapped. Flight time – of course we know that we never actually achieve the advertised flight time, but assuming that both companies inflate these numbers equally, then the E’s 40 mins vs.365g), but this plays into the flight time as per the next dot point. Battery weight – Again, the Mavic battery is smaller and lighter (297g vs.Size and weight – Smaller, and nearly 300g lighter, the Mavic is a winner for me.For a full listing, check out the manufacturer’s pages for the Evo II Pro and the Mavic 2 Pro. How I wish LinkedIn allowed tables for these sorts of comparisons… I’ve picked out a few of the specs that are most important to me. I aim to use the best equipment for the job regardless of the brand, so hopefully the following information is useful to you as well. I have no affiliation with either of these companies and remain brand agnostic with the drones I fly. However I do expect that the differences I experience in using them will remain in their newly updated models. Both of these drones will be superseded any day now. In this review I’ll focus on the following: the drone, remote controller, camera, and the app stack.īut firstly a caveat. I’m not a photographer or videographer so I’ll leave those opinions up to the experts! And yes you might argue that there are better (and more expensive) models out there but let’s start with these entry level offerings. Regardless of the intellectual property claims, let’s look at these two drones competing for the consumer market in the sub 2kg space, focusing on their mapping capabilities. DJI drone comparison: Facing off against each other we have the Autel Evo II Pro and the DJI Mavic 2 Pro… In many ways they are so similar that one might think they have come from the same factory or is it just a case of parallel evolution? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |